Part 2: The Real Problem With Walker County Schools Isn’t the Calendar
The four-day school week debate is a distraction. The real solution requires the Georgia legislature....and someone needs to start that conversation.
As I argued last week, the four-day school week won’t deliver what advocates promise. But the deeper question is why we’re having this debate at all.
Walker County Schools recently surveyed parents about switching to a four-day week. It’s the latest in an endless parade of seemingly important debates, schedule tweaks, and distracting shuffles that consume school boards across Georgia. Four days or five? Earlier start times or later? New reading curriculum or old? More technology or less?
But the truth is none of that matters very much.
Whether a district adopts the latest teaching fad, fits its state-mandated instructional minutes into fewer days, or rolls out yet another curriculum overhaul, they are merely rearranging deck chairs on the titanic. No schedule change, no new textbook, no instructional strategy will deliver meaningful improvement until we confront the structural rot underneath: the obsession with “seat time.”
To understand why, you need to know some history—and how Georgia has doubled down on it.
In 1905, steel magnate turned philanthropist Andrew Carnegie established a foundation to provide pensions for college professors. But he immediately had a problem How do you decide which institutions qualified as “colleges” rather than diploma mills looking for a payday. The solution required colleges to admit only students who completed a four-year high school course, which meant defining what a “high school education” actually was.
In 1906, the foundation proposed a standard unit of measurement. One “unit” equaled 120 hours of classroom contact. A neat, progressive-era metric. Colleges wanted pension money, so they adopted the standard. High schools wanted their graduates admitted to colleges, so they restructured their entire existence around it.
The Carnegie Unit wasn’t designed by educators studying how children learn. It was invented by accountants solving an administrative problem. Yet by 1930, this arbitrary metric had come to dominated American education. In Georgia, we haven’t just stuck with this century-old mistake. We’ve added to it.
While the original Carnegie standard called for 120 hours, Georgia defines a standard unit of credit as 150 clock hours. To meet this, the state mandates strict daily minimums. For high schoolers, that means 330 minutes of instruction per day. This rigid math dictates every bell schedule in the state. A student taking a standard six-period day must sit in a specific chair for roughly 50 minutes, 180 times a year, to reach that magic 9,000-minute mark.
This is a big reason why educational fads keep failing. You can introduce phonics or whole language, Singapore math or reform math, project-based learning or direct instruction. But every one of these approaches must be crammed into the same 150-hour box. The curriculum changes. The underlying architecture doesn’t. We keep redecorating a prison like a school should look while leaving the bars in place.
And the architecture gets something catastrophically wrong: people learn at different speeds.
You know this already. We all do. A child who devours books might need fourteen months to crack multiplication. A kid who struggles with reading might grasp chemistry immediately. The notion that 150 hours of seat time equals mastery of anything is absurd on its face … yet it remains the organizing principle of our schools.
In a time-based system, time is the constant and learning is the variable. A student who masters algebra in 60 hours must still sit through the remaining 90 to get credit. Bored. Disengaged. Waiting. Meanwhile, a student who needs 180 hours fails at the 150-hour mark and repeats the entire course, often re-sitting lessons they already understood. More often, that child gets passed along without acquiring the skill or knowledge required at all. The system rewards compliance, not competence.
Most Georgia districts, including Walker County, are “Strategic Waiver” or “Charter Systems.” Theoretically, this grants freedom from state rules. But in practice, districts rarely use these waivers to abandon seat time in favor of mastery. Instead, they use the flexibility to shuffle the hours, trading 180 short days for 150 long ones. They waive the schedule, not the philosophy. Funding remain tied to it.
We see the consequences everywhere. Nearly 40 percent of college freshmen require remedial coursework in math or English, subjects they supposedly mastered to earn their diplomas. Credit recovery programs allow students to “recover” a failed course by clicking through online modules in a fraction of the original 120 hours. If a student can earn the same credit in 20 hours of clicking that another student earned in a full year of classroom instruction, what exactly was the original seat time measuring? Employers have started to figure this out too, which is why many including Elon Musk have abandoned degree requirements in favor of skills assessments. The credentials our education system produces and cherishes have become proxies for compliance, not competence.
We’ve known the time model was broken for almost a century. The Eight-Year Study, conducted from 1930 to 1940 and funded ironically by the Carnegie Corporation itself, freed thirty high schools from Carnegie Unit requirements. They could design the system themselves. Students at these experimental schools could progress based on demonstrated learning rather than hours logged. The results were unambiguous. Graduates from experimental schools earned higher college GPAs, won more academic honors, and showed greater intellectual curiosity than their traditionally educated peers. The students from schools that deviated most from seat-time requirements showed the greatest advantages. The results should have transformed education. Instead, the findings were published in 1942, buried by World War II, and forgotten. We went back to counting hours.
Today, the Carnegie Foundation—the very organization that invented the Unit—is actively working to dismantle it, calling it “a barrier to reform.” States like New Hampshire have transitioned to competency-based systems where students advance when they demonstrate mastery, not when the calendar says so.
Georgia remains fixated on the clock. We have imprisoned educators and students in a system invented to calculate pension eligibility for professors who died before the Great Depression.
Local school board members need to understand that you are political actors whether you embrace it or not. The seat-time problem isn’t something Walker County can solve with a schedule survey or a curriculum adoption. It’s encoded in Georgia’s Quality Basic Education funding formula, in state requirements, in the entire statutory machinery that determines how schools operate.
Tinkering locally cannot fix a structural problem. That requires legislative action. Major structural reform.
This isn’t about picking fights in Atlanta. Most legislators have never heard the history of the Carnegie Unit, don’t know the time requirements, or haven’t seen the research on competency-based alternatives. They aren’t defending a broken system. They simply inherited it—just like we all have. The opportunity is education, not accusation. Local school Board members have the platform and the responsibility to start that conversation. Help your constituents understand why the current system fails. Not just that budgets are tight or test scores disappoint, but why we’re trapped in a model that rewards attendance rather than learning. Build coalitions with other districts. Bring legislators in as partners.
State representatives and senators want to help their communities. Give them something concrete to champion: seat-time reform, competency-based pilot programs, funding flexibility that recognizes one-size-fits-all fits no one.
Walker County’s four-day week survey will come and go. The next fad will surely pop up and yet more curriculum adoption will follow. Test scores will fluctuate. And nothing fundamental will change—until someone decides to stop debating which arrangement of 150-hour blocks works best and starts asking why we’re counting hours instead of learning.
The Carnegie Foundation has repudiated its own invention. Places like New Hampshire are showing alternatives can work. The research from the Eight-Year Study sits there, waiting to be rediscovered. Georgia School board members have the platform. Legislators have the power. They all have the duty and responsibility. Somebody in Georgia needs to go first.
Sources:
Baird, Katy. “Walker County Considers Four-Day School Week, Seeks Parent and Community Feedback.” Chattooga County News, 22 Dec. 2024, https://chattooga1180.com/walker-county-considers-four-day-school-week-seeks-parent-and-community-feedback/
“Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.” Encyclopædia Britannica, Britannica, accessed 26 Dec. 2025, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Carnegie-Foundation-for-the-Advancement-of-Teaching
“The Carnegie Unit: A Century-Old Standard in a Changing Education Landscape.” Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Jan. 2015, https://www.luminafoundation.org/files/resources/carnegie-unit-report.pdf
“District Flexibility.” Georgia Department of Education, accessed 26 Dec. 2025, https://gadoe.org/policy/district-flexibility/
“Eight-Year Study.” Education Encyclopedia: State University, accessed 26 Dec. 2025, https://education.stateuniversity.com/pages/1947/Eight-Year-Study.html
Felton, Ryan. “Walker Co. Schools Considering Four-Day School Week.” Local 3 News, 22 Dec. 2024, https://www.local3news.com/local-news/walker-co-schools-considering-four-day-school-week/article_c03269f2-12cc-42cc-99fd-15730b77cf55.html
“Foundation History.” Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, accessed 26 Dec. 2025, https://www.carnegiefoundation.org/about-us/foundation-history/
Georgia. General Assembly. Official Code of Georgia Annotated, § 20-2-168, 2024, https://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/title-20/chapter-2/article-6/part-4/section-20-2-168/
Georgia. State Board of Education. “160-4-2-.46 High School Graduation Requirements for Students Enrolling in the Ninth Grade for the First Time in the 2008-2009 School Year and Subsequent Years.” Rules of the Georgia State Board of Education, accessed 26 Dec. 2025, https://apps.gadoe.org/sboe/SBOE Rules/160-4-2-.46.pdf
Georgia. State Board of Education. “160-5-1-.02 School Day and School Year for Students and Employees.” Rules of the Georgia State Board of Education, accessed 26 Dec. 2025, https://apps.gadoe.org/sboe/SBOE Rules/160-5-1-.02.pdf
Governor’s Office of Student Achievement. “School System Flexibility Choices.” State of Georgia, July 2015, https://gosa.georgia.gov/document/document/system-flexibility-updatepdf/download
“The High School Credit-Hour: A Timeline of the Carnegie Unit.” Education Week, 7 Dec. 2022, https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/the-high-school-credit-hour-a-timeline-of-the-carnegie-unit/2022/12
“How New Hampshire Transformed to a Competency-Based System.” Aurora Institute, accessed 26 Dec. 2025, https://aurora-institute.org/blog/how-new-hampshire-transformed-to-a-competency-based-system/
Knowles, Timothy. “It May Be Time to Retire the Carnegie Unit. Are There Better Measures of Learning?” Education Week, 28 May 2024, https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/opinion-it-may-be-time-to-retire-the-carnegie-unit-are-there-better-measures-of-learning/2024/05
New Hampshire Department of Education. “Performance Assessment of Competency Education (PACE),” accessed 26 Dec. 2025, https://www.education.nh.gov/who-we-are/division-of-learner-support/bureau-of-instructional-support/performance-assessment-competency-education
Schwartz, Sarah. “The Head of the Carnegie Foundation Wants to Ditch the Carnegie Unit. Here’s Why.” Education Week, 14 Dec. 2022, https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/the-head-of-the-carnegie-foundation-wants-to-ditch-the-carnegie-unit-heres-why/2022/12
“Strategic Waivers School Systems (SWSS) Evaluation.” Governor’s Office of Student Achievement, State of Georgia, accessed 26 Dec. 2025, https://gosa.georgia.gov/accountability/strategic-waivers-school-systems-swss-evaluation
“What Is the Carnegie Unit?” Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, accessed 26 Dec. 2025, https://www.carnegiefoundation.org/about/faqs/the-carnegie-unit/